North East Windmills


Without government subsidies to the wind industry,
there is no wind industry.

  • Home
  • Articles
  • North East
  • Wind Problems
  • Wind Turbines
  • Wind Energy

Calculating Wind Turbine Setbacks With Science Instead of Politics

August 5, 2013 by Paul Crowe

Wind turbine blade failure happens

Wind turbine blade failure happens – setbacks are important for public safety

If there is one hot button issue in communities where wind turbines are being discussed, it’s setbacks, how far must wind turbines be kept from property lines, roads and occupied buildings. Wind developers want a very short distance so they can install the maximum number of turbines while residents and property owners want them kept as far away as possible, so the effects of the turbines are minimized. Wind developers come prepared with the usual rules of thumb or so called “industry standard” setbacks and seem shocked and amazed when anyone questions their numbers. The one thing they don’t provide is any basis for those “industry standards.” It’s almost as though they made them up out of thin air. There has to be a better way, and there is.

Engineering analysis or a finger in the wind

Recently, we discovered an excellent research article written by three aerospace engineers: A method for defining wind turbine setback standards, published in the journal Wind Energy. In the introduction they explained why they did the research:

These setback standards are intended to protect people and property from rotor blade fragments released from failed wind turbine blades. However, required setbacks are often based on rules of thumb involving some combination of turbine height and blade radius and typically have little or no rigorous physical foundation. There is currently a strong demand for re-evaluation of turbine setback distances in view of both increased turbine reliability and the desire to install more large turbines on small parcels of land. Specifically, it would be desirable to provide a technique that allows regulators and wind farm developers to determine setback requirements given a specific turbine model, the site parameters and an acceptable level of risk.

We couldn’t have said it any better ourselves.

Three turbines, surprising results

The engineers selected three different sized turbines for their study, a 660 KW, a 1.5 MW and a 3.0 MW. Blade radius for each respectively was: 77 feet, 115 feet and 148 feet with hub heights of 164 feet, 262 feet and 262 feet.

The wind turbines with lower power output have smaller rotors that rotate at higher speeds and that’s an important point because the engineers found higher velocity leads to longer blade fragment throws in the event of blade failure. The setback formulas used in local ordinances which are some multiple of hub height and rotor diameter fail to take this into account and come up with setbacks far short of where blade fragments can fall.

As an example, the throw distances calculated for these three turbines were: 1440 feet for the 660 KW turbine, 1935 feet for the 1.5 MW turbine and 1726 feet for the 3.0 MW turbine. The shorter 1.5 MW turbine threw fragments even further than the larger 3.0 MW model, over 200 feet further!

The full research article explains exactly how to calculate throw distances based on the operational specifications of specific wind turbine models. In all cases in the article, even with the smallest 660 KW turbine, the throw distance was far greater than the 1000 foot 1.75 times turbine height setback from a property line called for in the proposed wind ordinance for North East Township.

Though it may be reassuring to use a very simple and easily understood formula for setbacks, as the township officials have done in the ordinance, this is one instance where what they have called for is very simple and wrong.

Public safety demands objective analysis, not political compromise

In the last public meeting in North East Township, one supervisor, when asked where the 1000 foot number came from said it was a compromise. Unfortunately, compromising public safety is a very poor choice, especially when there is an objective method of determining setbacks, as illustrated in this article.

In light of this new information, and especially because the wind turbine manufacturers themselves call for a 500 meter (1640 foot) evacuation radius around a malfunctioning turbine, the township supervisors and the planning board are very strongly advised to rewrite the setback requirements in this ordinance to protect the interests of all residents of North East Township. Public safety demands it.

It would be extremely unfortunate if township officials were to insist on using any other factors besides public safety to influence their decisions and if they do so, the residents, taxpayers and voters will be asking for a full explanation of how their decision was made.

Filed Under: Wind Turbine Community Involvement Tagged With: complex technical issues, public safety, setbacks, wind ordinance

What can you do?

  • Be informed! Read as many articles on this website as you have time for, so you can understand the issue. Do your own research. Check us out.
  • Tell your neighbors about the wind turbines, point them to this website so they can learn more.

Comments

  1. Tammy C Truitt says

    September 15, 2013 at 10:40 am

    Setback measurements should begin at the point of the blade that is closest to neighboring properties or roadways. This point would be the blade in the 3:00 position, not the center of the tower base. This starting point of measure makes the most sense because this is the closest point where turbulence and noise originate.
    When the distance to structures are measured, the measurement is not taken from the center of the structure, but from the closest point. The same standard of measurement should be employed for the industrial wind turbine.

  2. Edna M Huerta says

    January 14, 2014 at 4:41 pm

    I do not feel this is fare when we bought this land knowing nothing about this and friends are filling us in and the proporty owner didn’t sign the papers for this the x-husband did so its not legal for this proporty any way and i do not want them around my grand children. very upset

Unfortunately

The less you know about wind energy,
the more you'll like it.

Why wind developers never understand …

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.

~ Upton Sinclair

Don’t know – Don’t care

Is willful ignorance necessary
to promote wind energy?

No, but it helps.

Climate Change

Another thing I must point out is that you cannot prove a vague theory wrong. … Also, if the process of computing the consequences is indefinite, then with a little skill any experimental results can be made to look like the expected consequences.

~ Richard Feynman, 1964

It’s not on-demand, it’s no-demand

Wind energy is "no-demand" electricity. If the wind isn't blowing and you demand electricity, the answer is no.

Wind – expensive, inefficient, unreliable



December 1923 Popular Science cover dreaming about generating electricity from windmills, and though the dream never dies, the dream doesn't work, didn't then, doesn't now and without huge government giveaways of your money, no wind farms would get built anywhere. The government forces utilities to buy wind power so payments to landowners are simply wind welfare.


Wind energy runs on tax credits

"I will do anything that is basically covered by the law to reduce Berkshire's tax rate, for example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit."
~ Warren Buffett - from interview with Fortune magazine

Wind investments and high cost green energy

“I’m in the wind business … I’ve lost my ass in the business. ... Hey, we can get on everything green. We can get on everything renewable. Then the cost of power will go up ten times."
~ T. Boone Pickens - on Morning Joe on MSNBC

Wind Turbine Map

Information you'll only see here.

The complete map of all of the wind turbines proposed by Pioneer Green Energy in Erie County, PA and filed with the FAA. Plans not yet filed are not shown.

Recent Comments

  • Susan Dudley on Omnibus Spending Bill Extends Wind Energy PTC for 5 Years with Phaseout Over Last 3 Years
  • Jack Christman a on Omnibus Spending Bill Extends Wind Energy PTC for 5 Years with Phaseout Over Last 3 Years
  • Suzanne Albright on Omnibus Spending Bill Extends Wind Energy PTC for 5 Years with Phaseout Over Last 3 Years
  • Chris on Pioneer Green Energy Quits Wind Project in North East, PA
  • Tammy C. Truitt on Pioneer Green Energy Quits Wind Project in North East, PA
  • Shannon Mackey on Pioneer Green Energy Quits Wind Project in North East, PA
  • Tammy C. Truitt on Defense Department Rebuffs Pioneer Green Energy in Maryland

North East Windmills

  • Vestas Shares Sink with Donald Trump’s Election Win
  • Supreme Court Halts Enforcement of Clean Power Plan
  • Omnibus Spending Bill Extends Wind Energy PTC for 5 Years with Phaseout Over Last 3 Years
  • Pioneer Green Energy Quits Wind Project in North East, PA
  • Defense Department Rebuffs Pioneer Green Energy in Maryland

RSS North East PA Online

  • North East School District Requesting Leasing Proposals for Digital Copiers
  • NE Borough Holding Public Hearings on Skill Based Gaming Devices and Property Maintenance Ordinances
  • North East Borough Water Authority Special Meeting Scheduled
  • Reminder – Borough Council Meeting and Candidate Meet and Greet Tonight
  • Greenfield Township Supervisors Meetings Time Change

RSS Erie County Report

  • Remember This Photo From the Erie Airport? Did You Ever See It?
  • Here’s a Quick Way to Increase Your Resistance to COVID-19
  • Test What Works Before Building a Community College
  • How Many College Students are Hospitalized From COVID-19? – Zero?
  • Dangerous and Safe Gatherings Due to COVID-19 – a Helpful Guide
  • The Reported Number of COVID-19 Cases May Be Up to 90 Percent Too High

Copyright © 2025 · North East Windmills · Website by Crowe Computer Services
This website proudly Made in the USA!
Made in the USA